Most Texans vote for base closing plan
October 27, 2005
The House voted 324-85 to allow the first round of U.S. military base closures and consolidations in a decade.
Written by Associated Press, Beaumont Enterprise
Rep. Tom DeLay joined nine other Texans, most of them Democrats, to oppose a base closing plan Thursday, but he ended up on the losing side.
The House voted 324-85 to allow the first round of U.S. military base closures and consolidations in a decade. Texas installations that would be closed include Naval Station Ingleside, Lone Star Ammunition Plant and Brooks City Base in San Antonio. Red River Army Depot will be realigned and F-16s stationed at Ellington Field near Houston will be removed.
Also, thousands more troops will be added to Fort Bliss, but Fort Hood will lose a temporary unit local officials hoped would be permanent.
Along with DeLay, Republican Reps. Ted Poe of Houston, Mike McCaul of Austin and Ron Paul of Surfside opposed the recommendations of the Base Closure and Realignment Commission. Democrats who opposed the plan were Reps. Chet Edwards of Waco; Al Green and Gene Green of Houston; Ruben Hinojosa of Mercedes, Eddie Bernice Johnson of Dallas and Solomon Ortiz of Corpus Christi.
The vote marked the first time DeLay has opposed a base closing plan, said spokeswoman Shannon Flaherty.
DeLay asked the Air Force to keep the 147th Fighter Wing at Ellington Field until unmanned drones scheduled to be at the air field are delivered. He also has asked for a schedule for removing the F-16s from Ellington.
"It should be plain to see that instead of removing our fighter wing, Ellington Field is in need of more personnel, greater maintenance and better military assets," DeLay said. "And yet, the BRAC Commission has chosen to realign Ellington, removing its F-16 fighter wing, and leaving the Gulf Coast in many ways more vulnerable than it is now. "
The base closings and realignments _ backed by the Pentagon, White House, Republican leaders and many Democrats are intended to streamline military facilities and troops and put savings toward improving U.S. military forces and restructuring them to respond to future threats.
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.