Will This Happen Again?
December 2, 2005
With the school finance decision finally out, leaders will take another look at tax reform.
Written by Senator Shapleigh, www.shapleigh.org
Last week the Governor-appointed Texas Tax Reform Commission met for the first time in Austin. The Texas Supreme Court also issued its decision on the school finance case, Neeley v. West Orange-Cove Consolidated, deciding that the property tax had reached unconstitutional levels. In response to the upcoming spring special session, Senator Shapleigh asked whether the failed priorities of the previous special sessions will continue to plague the Legislature.
"During the session, state leaders set the priority as tax cuts," Senator Shapleigh stated. "The priority needs to be providing our children a 21st Century education so that they can compete for a good job in the 21st Century economy."
An analysis of the tax bills proposed during the special sessions showed that 9 in 10 Texans got tax hikes and a bare 3% increase in funding to cover inflation at schools that serve 4 million Texas children, while the wealthiest 10% would receive tax cuts and millions of new dollars for schools that serve only 400,000 children.
Click above for larger image
In addition, the school finance proposals expanded the funding gap between property poor and property wealthy districts.
"In Austin, state leaders devotion to equity in funding, yet the proposed plans would have actually increased the gap in funding by hundreds of dollars per student between property poor and wealthy districts," Senator Shapleigh stated referring to education funding models like the chart below that were provided by the Legislative Budget Board.
"Under HB 2 and 3, nine in ten pay more for less, so one in ten can pay less for more. Texans elected us educate every child and leave no child behind. We can and must do better.”
Click above for larger image
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.