Print_header

Heat Index: A fact check of Perry's claim on education spending
November 14, 2009

THE CLAIM: In his campaign stump speech, Gov. Rick Perry states that when Texas faced with a budget shortfall in 2003, he and the Legislature cut spending instead of raising taxes but were able to put more money into priorities. "When we cut $10 billion out of our budget -- out of our spending -- we also increased funding for public schools. We put $1.8 billion more into public schools," he says.

Written by Ryan J. Rusak, The Dallas Morning News

THE CLAIM: In his campaign stump speech, Gov. Rick Perry states that when Texas faced with a budget shortfall in 2003, he and the Legislature cut spending instead of raising taxes but were able to put more money into priorities. "When we cut $10 billion out of our budget -- out of our spending -- we also increased funding for public schools. We put $1.8 billion more into public schools," he says.

THE FACTS: Between the 2002-03 and 2004-05 school years, the state increased its contribution to public schools by a little more than $400 million -- not the $1.8 billion Perry claims. And the increased spending by the state covered only the costs of increasing enrollment. About 143,000 more students were added to Texas schools in that period.
Texas Education Agency budget figures show that over that time, the state's contribution per student went from $2,801 per student to $2,800. The state also cut its contribution to teacher health benefits.
More money went into schools, but the bulk of that came from increased property taxes on local homeowners and businesses. Over that period of time the state shifted its burden to taxpayers, who put in $2 billion more for public education. The federal government kicked in an additional $100 million.
The governor's campaign says the numbers are derived from Legislative Budget Board's final state budget report showing total money to public education when from $32.9 billion in 2002-03 to $34.8 million in 2004-05. But that includes all revenue streams, including federal money, property taxes and state spending.

Peppers3

Click here to view larger image.

BOTTOM LINE: It's technically true that in the budget the Legislature wrote in 2003, the state spent more money than in the previous one. But it's misleading to suggest that money did anything other than help schools tread water.

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Copyright © 2024 - Senator Eliot Shapleigh  •  Political Ad Paid For By Eliot Shapleigh