Print_header

Proof of citizenship bill dies in House
May 27, 2009

"Proposed bill strongly decried by minority and civil rights advocates that would require applicants for new or renewed driver’s licenses to furnish proof of citizenship or residency died in the Texas House on Wednesday."

Written by Julian Aguilar, Rio Grande Guardian

AUSTIN– A proposed bill strongly decried by minority and civil rights advocates that would require applicants for new or renewed driver’s licenses to furnish proof of citizenship or residency died in the Texas House on Wednesday.

Senate Bill 1785 by state Sen. John Carona would have hindered the ability of legal residents, minorities and the elderly from receiving driver’s licenses or IDs, opponents allege.

The bill was knocked off the Local, Consent and Resolutions calendar after House Democrats used a “signature” rule to first move the bill to the end of the calendar. Five members who affirm with their signatures they oppose a bill may kick it back to the end of the calendar. If the bill is called up again and the signatures remain, the bill dies.

State Rep. Tommy Merritt, R-Longview, chair of the House Committee on Public Safety, sponsored the bill in the House. He urged committee members last week to vote the bill out for consideration on the House floor. The law, he said, would take the issue out of the courts and into the hands of the legislature, referring to a pending law suit filed against the Texas Department of Public Safety in January. Opponents, including state Rep. Lon Burnam, D-Fort Worth, said DPS clerks that earn a modest $2,000 per month should not also be asked to enforce immigration laws, which some contend should be done at the federal level.

After the bill died Merritt appeared to have expected the outcome but said he thought the bill’s opponents might not have known exactly what it did or what was already in the DPS database. An analysis of the bill reflects that out of the 22.6 million driver records in the current database, only about 317,000 unexpired records lack citizenship verification.

“We worked for months on this bill and in my opinion it was developed in a manner of fairness of the concerns of individuals that, maybe, would be affected the greatest, with the greatest problems,” he said. He said his bill changed the current law that requires foreign students to renew their IDs every year instead to every two, and would have removed some of the information currently contained in the magnetic strip on the back of the ID some people currently object to. DPS employees, he added, would go through additional training to help them better identify citizenship documents.

The lawsuit against DPS is pending in a Travis Country District Court following a claim levied against the department by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund. MALDEF filed suit after DPS amended its policies last year and began denying driver’s licenses to legal residents who furnished visas that expired in less than a year. DPS would also give legal non-citizens a vertical driver’s license stamped “temporary visitor.”

The temporary visitor stamp would have been removed if the bill had been adopted, added Merritt

In January MALDEF attorney Luis Figueroa explained that DPS and its governing body, the Public Safety Commission, exceeding their authority when they adopted the policy change without legislative authority. MALDEF prevailed temporarily when a judge granted a temporary injunction that halted the practice, but an appeal was filed by DPS, allowing it to proceed during the appeal.
 
“What has occurred is the individuals that are concerned about this piece of legislation would rather vent this out in the courts,” said Merritt. “They are going to take their chance in the court case versus filing this legislation.”

Despite the volatile political climate surrounding the issue, Merritt said that he and his committee, comprised of five Republicans and Democrats, worked endlessly to come to a compromise and praised all sides for their efforts.

“A turtle can’t walk unless it sticks its neck out,” he said. “And so it’s about taking a risk, a political risk, to solve a problem.”

Opponents of the proposed driver’s license legislation say that the elderly, who may not have access to birth certificates or other proof-of-citizenship documents or minorities born by midwife would be adversely affected. Moreover, they contend, foreign students and the poor who can’t afford the documents would also be adversely affected.

Lawmakers who want DPS to tighten the reins on who can get a driver’s license or an ID tried to insert the language requiring proof of citizenship on the DPS sunset bill, which went before the House earlier this month. The language was withdrawn, however, after the bill author state Rep. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, acknowledged that a long and drawn out floor debate is not the best way to make laws.

Standing in opposition to the bill with MALDEF is the American Civil Liberties Union, the NAACP and the AARP.

Below is a list of the House Democrats that signed off in opposition to the bill:

Roberto Alonzo, Dallas
Norma Chavez, El Paso
Marisa Marquez, El Paso
Armando “Mando” Martinez, Weslaco
Yvonne Gonzalez Toureilles, Alice
Roland Gutierrez, San Antonio
Richard Peña Raymond, Laredo
Armando Walle, Houston
Diana Maldonado, Round Rock
Yvonne Davis, Dallas
Ismael “Kino” Flores, Palmview
Ryan Guillen, Rio Grande City
Solomon Ortiz, Jr., Corpus Christi
Joe Farias, San Antonio
Eddie Lucio III, San Benito
Veronica Gonzales, McAllen
Dora Olivo, Rosenberg
Tara Rios Ybarra, South Padre Island
Trey Martinez Fischer, San Antonio
Elliott Naishtat, Austin
Abel Herrero, Robstown

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Copyright © 2024 - Senator Eliot Shapleigh  •  Political Ad Paid For By Eliot Shapleigh