Print_header

Personal income tax can boost schools, Texas
March 17, 2007

A modest personal state income tax would support public schools, return property tax dollars to homeowners and ensure everyone pays their fair share.

Written by Lesley Nicole Ramsey, San Antonio News-Express

A powerful group of voices has joined the chorus calling for greater investment in public education.
The Raise Your Hand coalition — which includes the CEOs of H-E-B, AT&T, Frost Bank, Bank One, Continental Airlines and other leading Texas businesses — called on the Legislature to increase school spending by $2,000 per student.
The coalition recognizes investing in public education is a smart investment. When Texas has an adequately skilled and educated workforce, businesses do well, the economy flourishes, and everyone is better off.
Right now, Texas is way behind. Texas invests far less on education than most other states. We rank 39th on spending per pupil. To put things in perspective, Texas annually spends $7,142 per pupil and $20,323 per prisoner.
A $2,000 increase would go far in bringing most school district spending up to at least the national average. For San Antonio Independent School District, a $2,000 spending boost would bring $113 million in new investment in our children.
This new investment wouldn't come without a cost. Statewide, the additional $2,000 per student would cost Texas an extra $9 billion to cover current students. Texas has one of the fastest growing child populations in the country. School enrollment is expected to almost double to more than 8 million students by 2040.
To pay for this, Texas may have to change the way it generates revenue.
For years, Texas has struggled to fund public schools fairly and adequately. Last legislative session, under pressure of a court order threatening to close schools, legislators came up with a mix of new taxes on cigarettes, used cars and businesses.
As a result, schools were able to open and school districts would be able to reduce local property taxes. It now turns out these new state taxes are not going to bring in enough money to pay for the property tax cuts. The Legislature will need to take more than $6 billion from other important programs to help bridge the gap over the next two years.
This is not a long-term solution. To continue funding public education, even at its current level, lawmakers are going to have to continually look for new funding sources. As long as Texas keeps turning to the same two pots of money — sales and property taxes — we will continue to come up short.
The problem with the sales and property taxes is that they tap a revenue base that generally grows more slowly than the state's economy. Not only that, but Texans pay some of the highest sales and property taxes in the country. These taxes hit working and middle class families the hardest.
A modest personal state income tax would support public schools, return property tax dollars to homeowners and ensure everyone pays their fair share.
Based on individual Texans' ability to pay, a personal state income tax could generate about $16 billion a year. The state constitution requires that two-thirds of that revenue be used to cut property taxes. That would easily reduce property taxes from the $1 per $100 of property value set by the new school-finance laws to 20 cents or less.
By law, the remaining revenue from an income tax must be spent on public education, bringing in enough money to increase school spending and solve Texas' school funding problem once and for all.
That's something we would all be able to raise our hands about.
Lesley Nicole Ramsey is outreach director at the Center for Public Policy Priorities in Austin.

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Copyright © 2025 - Senator Eliot Shapleigh  •  Political Ad Paid For By Eliot Shapleigh