News Room

Legislators stirring up controversial pot on abortion-related bills
April 22, 2009

With less than two months left in a session dominated by fights over voter identification bills, insurance and federal stimulus money, supporters of the major abortion-related bills are hoping they can whip their issue back to the forefront.

Written by Jim Vertuno, The Associated Press

431612336

HARRY CABLUCK / Ap Sen. Dan Patrick, R-Houston, calls on a witness during a meeting of the Senate Education Committee as they hear testimony about giving private school vouchers to children with disabilities Tuesday, April 7, 2009, in Austin, Texas. (AP Photo/Harry Cabluck)

AUSTIN - After months with little or no action, Texas lawmakers are stirring up the emotional cauldron that always brews with abortion-related bills.

A House committee was hearing testimony on a bill that would require women seeking abortions to first have an ultrasound and be shown the results. A Senate panel on Tuesday approved creating new "Choose Life" license plates.

With less than two months left in a session dominated by fights over voter identification bills, insurance and federal stimulus money, supporters of the major abortion-related bills are hoping they can whip their issue back to the forefront.

"There's time," said Joe Pojman, executive director of Texas Alliance for Life. "It's kind like an aircraft: Either you have altitude or you have speed. We have less altitude but I think we're getting speed before you crash ... It's going to be crunch time soon."

Kyleen Wright, president of the Texans for Life Coalition, called the ultrasound bill the "top priority" for anti-abortion groups.

Opponents of the bills are counting on time running out and a lack of will from lawmakers to pin their ears back for an all-out fight like the one that erupted in the Senate over a voter identification bill.

So far, the ultrasound bill has stalled in the Senate.

The bill by Sen. Dan Patrick, a Houston Republican and conservative radio talk show host, would require women seeking an abortion to have the ultrasound but gives them the option of whether to view the images. It passed the Senate Health and Human Services committee but is stuck waiting for a full Senate vote that may never come.

Patrick passed the bill in the Senate two years ago. But Republicans lost a seat in the 2008 elections and while the GOP still holds a 19-12 majority, Senate rules require 21 votes to bring a bill to the floor for a vote.

That gives Democrats just enough votes to block bills they don't want. Patrick says he's one vote shy of getting the bill before the full Senate.

"Last session, I passed this bill before the opposition had a chance to mobilize," Patrick said. "(This year) the opposition has been mobilized against this bill since Day One. I'm not giving up."

The ultrasound and "Choose Life" bills had some early momentum.

Republican Gov. Rick Perry endorsed the license plate bill in December. In February, Perry and Republican Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst joined hundreds at a rally on the Capitol steps in support of the ultrasound bill.

In the House, the ultrasound bill has 59 of the 150 House members signed on in support. It was in the lineup in the House State Affairs Committee on Tuesday.

Blake Rocap, legislative counsel for NARAL Pro-Choice of Texas, which opposes the ultrasound bill, predicts that's as far as it will go. House members are still congratulating themselves over passing a unanimous budget and won't want to peel back the lid on such an emotional issue.

Related Stories

Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.